🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the physical loss of hallowed earth.